I don't care what you think.
CNNs gotten irritating of late, as they push for more
interaction. They incessantly promote their blogs, their Twitter feed, and worst of all, their iReporters.
It wasn't unexpected: CNN and other news outlets discovered, like the major networks did, that reality is cheap. People will put their opinions on grainy video for free, just for the chance to be seen on TV for a brief, shining moment. Now you can interview the 'man on the street' without even having to go to the street. Heck, there may not be a street to go to.
Problem is, I don't care what these schmoes think. Part of the problem is that this isn't really what those schmoes are thinking: it's what a bunch of editors at CNN think you're thinking. They comb through hundreds or thousands of submissions, and then pare these down to a few seconds of sound bites. Even brilliant thinkers would have a hard time expressing anything coherent in such a format, and let's face it... there are a lot of stupid people out there.
And recently, hearing people express their anger over the AIG bonus hullabaloo is particularly irritating to me. Look, I understand the outrage the $165 million in bonuses that AIG is planning on handing out to their employees. I could
go into detail about why I think they should pay those people the
bonuses and move on, but Ruth Marcus at the Washington Post can say it much more eloquently. The only people who have anything to gain from this are lawyers - and remember, you, me, and everyone you know with a Social Security card owns 80% of AIG, so it's your money that would be spent. So let's have a good laugh and move on already, people.
I believe that there are people out there who have interesting perspectives on AIG and more important issues. I just think news organizations should find people who know what they're talking about, and then give them more than 20 seconds to say it. But then that would cut into the commercial breaks.